Posts

"First Look: FIBONACCI-Numbers and LUCAS-Numbers and Newcastle disease virus: A Very Reasonable Fit" by Stefan Geier

Bild
First Look: FIBONACCI-Numbers and LUCAS-Numbers and Newcastle disease virus: A Very Reasonable Fit by Stefan Geier Newcastle disease virus f ollows a 5 + 3 = 8 scheme with Fibonacci-numbers F(5) + F(4) = F(6) as seen in panel A of Figure 1 by  Yuqi Duan, Guiying Leng, Menglan Liu and Zhiqiang Duan 2025. The first Fibonacci-numbers and Lucas-numbers: Fibonacci F(n ): 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, ... Lucas L(n ): 2, 1, 3, 4, 7 , 11, 18, 29, 47, 76, 123, ... Evidence: Fig 1 . Schematic representation of NDV genome-coded products and genome organization . (A) Diagram of NDV genome and genome-encoded proteins. (B) The numbers in parentheses of NDV genome map indicate the nt lengths of viral non-transcribed Le, Tr, and IGSs. The first and second row of numbers above the map indicate the nt and aa lengths of the viral genes and proteins, respectively. The position of nt insertion sites is shown below the map denoted by * , †, and ‡. (C) The gene-start, gene-end, and intergenic se...

First Look: FIBONACCI-Numbers and LUCAS-Numbers and Ebola Virus (Orthoebolavirus): A Very Reasonable Fit

Bild
F irst Look: FIBONACCI-Numbers and LUCAS-Numbers and Ebola Virus (Orthoebolavirus): A Very Reasonable Fit by Stefan Geier The mumber of relevant genes and proteins (3′-NP-VP35-VP40-GP-VP30-VP24-L-5′) of Ebola Virus (Orthoebolavirus) is seven. 7 is the 4th Lucas number L(4). Further studies would be very relevant. The first Fibonacci-numbers and Lucas-numbers: Fibonacci F(n ): 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, ... Lucas L(n ): 2, 1, 3, 4, 7 , 11, 18, 29, 47, 76, 123, ... The above provides an at least very reasonable association of the  Ebola Virus (Orthoebolavirus)  with the GEIER programme based on GEIER's Equations and FIBOBACCI-Numbers and LUCAS-Numbers. I n addition, the surface Ebola virus (EBOV) trimeric glycoprotein (GP) spike shows trimerous structure similar to 3-merous flowers fitting F(4) as well as L(2). (Please, compare with the tetramerous structure of hantavirus spikes;  https://humanistischebetrachtungen1.blogspot.com/2026/05/first-look-fibobacci-number...

"Gavitation takes over" at a black hole: Is the pi in Geier's equation [pi=h/2ħ=damping(Newton's cradle)/damping(bifilar pendulum)] related to the spin of #Sagittarius A * by gravitons with spin 2ħ

Bild
Spin of the black hole Sgr A* (11: ...): "Gavitation takes over" at a black hole: Is the pi in Geier's equation [pi=h/2ħ=damping(Newton's cradle)/damping(bifilar pendulum)] related to the spin of #Sagittarius A * by gravitons with spin 2ħ (please, see researchgate ...) decoupled of the the pi in radiation etc. related to h. Are we right? Yours Stefan Geier youtube.com [LIVE] Sagittarius A * Black Hole | Q&A Panel [Event Horizon Telescope] 

Tag der Pflege, 12. Mai 2026: Wir sollten deutlich mehr Lebensqualität anstreben!

Wir sollten deutlich mehr Lebensqualität anstreben! Euer Stefan Geier, Haidholzen Tag der Pflege, 12. Mai 2026 #QoL #QOL #tagderpflege #Pflege #LQ #GDH Geier Stefan, et al.: Lebensqualität ist sehr viel wichtiger als Ruhm! - Wir sollten deutlich mehr Lebensqualität anstreben anstatt Ruhm! ResearchGate, May 12 2026, DOI:  10.13140/RG.2.2.34054.33608 . Our research is available on @ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/404762364_Lebensqualitat_ist_sehr_viel_wichtiger_als_Ruhm_-_Wir_sollten_deutlich_mehr_Lebensqualitat_anstreben_anstatt_Ruhm?utm_source=twitter&rgutm_meta1=eHNsLUkrTW5Fall3ZXVla0NtVUlQVU9lNUE1V1dZL3pxUkMzaHBYTStNMDU4TnBLakZaYjdpM2Jja0NDSzRtcW1vUUkwemhLb3VLS01pZjNHVlgyY3VxeGl3UT0%3D

Consecutive FIBONACCI-number ratios F(n+1) / F(n) as a damped alternating oscillator around and approximating Phi = Φ

Bild
Consecutive FIBONACCI-number ratios F(n+1) / F(n) as a damped alternating oscillator around and approximating Phi = Φ by Stefan Geier Because of lim (Ln/Fn) = 5^1/2 for n to infinite and Ln the n-th LUCAS-number Fn and the n-th FIBONACCI-number the content of GEIER Stefan et al. “Consecutive Lucas-number ratios L(n+1) / L(n) as a damped alternating oscillator around and approximating Phi = Φ“ is correct for FIBONACCI-numbers, too. Therefore we state: Consecutive FIBONACCI-number ratios F(n+1) / F(n) can be interpreted as a damped alternating oscillator around and approximating Phi = Φ . Critique welcome! Refinement welcome! Yours sincerely, Stefan Geier Gerhart-Hauptmann-Straße 6 83071 Stephanskirchen, Haidholzen, Germany, Europe References: Chandra, Pravin and Weisstein, Eric W. "Fibonacci Number." From MathWorld --A Wolfram Resource. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/FibonacciNumber.html . Geier Stefan et al. Consecutive Lucas-number ratios L(n+1) / L(n) as ...

Hox Genes Fit FIBONACCI-Numbers and LUCAS-Numbers to a Very Reasonable Extent by Stefan Geier

Bild
Hox Genes Fit FIBONACCI-Numbers and LUCAS-Numbers to a Very Reasonable Extent by Stefan Geier Hypothesis: Hox genes fit FIBONACCI-Numbers and LUCAS-Numbers. Evidence: 1. Number of Hox genes: 1.1. The typical number of Hox genes in mammals is13; 13 is the 7th FIBONACCI-number F(7). 1.2. The typical number of Hox genes in zebrafish is 13; 13 is the 7th FIBONACCI-number F(7). 1.3. The typical number of Hox genes in Drosophila is 8; 8 is the 6th FIBONACCI-number F(6). 2. Number of chromosomal clusters (secondary evidence): 2.1. The typical number of chromosomal clusters of Hox genes in mammals is 4; 4 is the third LUCAS-number L(3) . 2.2. The typical number of of chromosomal clusters of Hox genes in zebrafish is 7; 7 is the fourth LUCAS-number L(4). The first Fibonacci-numbers and Lucas-numbers: Fibonacci F(n ): 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, ... Lucas L(n ): 2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18, 29, 47, 76, 123, ... In addition,  the recognition-helix interval  is framed by 47=L(8) and 55...

A Note on "Hox genes, homeodomain specificity and GEIER's Fibonacci/Lucas-number programme in development (GEIER’s equations and Hox Genes, Part 1)" by Stefan Geier et al.

Bild
A Note on "Hox genes, homeodomain specificity and GEIER's Fibonacci/Lucas-number programme in development (GEIER’s equations and Hox Genes, Part 1)" by Stefan Geier et al.   This paper is a bold and stimulating attempt to connect established Hox biology with a Fibonacci/Lucas-based numerical framework, and it succeeds in doing so without abandoning biological seriousness [1–4]. Its main virtue is conceptual: the authors do not present the numerical observations as settled mechanism, but as a falsifiable research programme that can be assessed through future replication, curation and null-model testing. The biological foundation is strong. The manuscript accurately reflects the current view that Hox genes are central regulators of anterior-posterior patterning and that their activity depends on combinatorial specificity, cofactors, chromatin context and developmental timing. This is an important strength, because it grounds the numerical discussion in a well-established ...