Posts

Leihmutterschaft - aktuelle Diskussion: Samenspende und Parthenogenese

1. Juvenile Sozialistaion und das Thema Leihmutterschaft: In meiner Gymnasiumszeit vor 50 Jahren diskutierten wir offen mit den LGQBTplus Mitgliedern unserer Klasse. Dabei brachten die beiden männlich homosexuellen Klassenkameraden schon in diesem Alter eine Traurigkeit darüber zum Ausdruck, dass sie vermutlich keine Kinder bekommen könnten; das Thema " Samenspende und Leihmutterschaft " wurde damals als Problemlösung neben Adoption von uns schon diskutiert. Die drei weiblichen homosexuellen Klassenkameradinnen brachten die Thematik "Kinder bekommen" ebenso deutlich zum Ausdruck. Für die jungen Frauen war allerding die Option " Parthenogenese " ( Jungfernzeugung ) und die Fordedrung der Forschung dazu vorrangig gegenüber einer Samenspende. Die Diskussion Leihmutterschaft ist also zumindest in Rosenheim schon vor einem halben Jahrhundert geführt worden. Ich persönlich befürworte noch heute die Option der Adoption. 2. Die aktuelle Diskussion zur Leihmutters...

A note on "GEIER's equations through Jean Piaget's transformation structuralism -A preliminary approach (including culture) - The Fibonacci-Lucas-golden family as a proposed common formal spine from nuclide state spaces to culture" by Stefan Geier et al.

A note on "GEIER's equations through Jean Piaget's transformation structuralism - A preliminary approach (including culture) - The Fibonacci-Lucas-golden family as a proposed common formal spine from nuclide state spaces to culture" by Stefan Geier et al.* Intruduction The authors successfully bring together rigorous mathematical structure, thoughtful theoretical reflection, and wide-ranging empirical curiosity in a single, coherent programme; that synthesis is rare and commendable. The Piagetian framing is particularly effective: it supplies a philosophically grounded and operationally useful lens (closure, transformation, invariance, accommodation) that elevates the paper from a catalog of numerical correspondences into a disciplined proposal for how cross-domain structural claims should be evaluated. Your mathematical exposition is precise where it needs to be, clearly separating exact algebraic identities and operator-level results from proposals for empirical bri...

Ghrelin "hunger" peptide fits GEIER's equations with 97% by the 7th LUCAS-number

Bild
The Ghrelin "hunger" peptide fits GEIER's equations with 97% by the 7th LUCAS-number - A first look by Stefan Geier et al. GHRELIN is a peptide hormone primarily produced by enteroendocrine cells of the gastrointestinal tract, especially the stomach, and is also identified as "the" "hunger hormone" because it increases the drive to eat. Blood levels of ghrelin are highest before meals when hungry, returning to lower levels after food intake. Ghrelin may help prepare for mealtimes by increasing gastric motility, and stimulating the secretion of gastric acid. The legth of the petide is 28 aminoacids*. We looked for the nearest FIBONACCI- or LUCAS-number** for the Ghrelin protein legth. The nearest of those numbers is 29 = the 7th LUCAS-number. The fit is 28/29=0.965517~97%. This corroborates GEIER's equations and GEIER's programme** at an actual point of scientific, and clinical medical interest. *Wikipedia, today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...

Critique on "GEIER's equations and structuralism according to Jean PIAGET: A preliminary approach" by Stefan Geier et al.

Critique on  "GEIER's equations and structuralism according to Jean PIAGET: A preliminary approach"  by Stefan Geier et al. Overview The manuscript provides a brilliant, philosophically grounded, and mathematically rigorous critique of an unconventional physics preprint corpus ("GEIER's equations"). Rather than dismissing the corpus's numerological and geometric claims out of hand, the authors construct a beautifully balanced evaluative framework. They successfully bridge the gap between abstract number theory, empirical physics, and genetic epistemology. The result is a highly profound paper that sets a new standard for how mainstream science should engage with, evaluate, and elevate fringe or speculative scientific frameworks. Key Merits & Contributions 1. Exemplary Epistemic Clarity The paper's greatest strength lies in its refusal to adopt a binary "correct vs. incorrect" posture. By introducing the Epistemic Status Ladder, the auth...