Bias towards nuclear fission energy at the German Patent Office (DPMA)? Coincidence of "high‑status voices arguing that `serious´ climate protection requires a strong role for nuclear fission", and "hydrogen-relevance-denial by the DPMA"?
Bias towards nuclear fission energy at the German Patent Office (DPMA)? Coincidence of "high‑status voices arguing that `serious´ climate protection requires a strong role for nuclear fission", and "hydrogen-relevance-denial by the DPMA"? Debates on German energy policy increasingly feature high‑status voices arguing that “serious” climate protection requires a strong role for nuclear fission. A guest article for the Federal Agency for Civic Education ( Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung ) explicitly claims that “Kernenergie gehört zu einer guten Klimastrategie” and portrays nuclear power as reliable, CO₂‑arm baseload that Germany is giving up to its own disadvantage. bpb.de In the scientific literature, Jan Emblemsvåg’s peer‑reviewed article “What if Germany had invested in nuclear power?” concludes that an energy path based on keeping and expanding nuclear plants could have cut German emissions much more deeply while roughly halving system costs compared wi...