Comment on “Weighing the W boson” based on Geier’s Newton’s cradle; Claudio Campagnari, Martijn Mulders, An upset to the standard model, high-precision measurement of the w boson mass with the cdf ii detector, Science, 376, 6589, (136-136), (2022)./doi/10.1126/science.abm0101

 

Comment on “Weighing the W boson” based on Geier’s Newton’s cradle

 Our “Quantum Interpretation“ of the bifilar pendulum (experimentally compared to Newton’s cradle) suggests that every determination of mass should be coupled with an about (at least) 1 % Higgs-filed-graviton-mass-interaction of measurement by the relation HIGGS-coupling 0.000002 / damping(bifilar pendulum = 0.0002) = 0.01. If you apply this to a nucleon (thus co-determined by W-bosons) and electron determined steel ball system interaction you reach a value of 3.33 per mille: HIGGS-coupling 0.000002 / damping(Geier Newton’s cradle = 0.0006) / = 0.0033. The deviation of the Tevatron W-boson measurement to the theoretical standard model value of the mass of the W-boson is .95 per mille; however this is lower than our 3.33 per mille quantum correction we would expect. Furthermore, if you bring in Max PLANCK’s Wirkungsquantum h, respective pi (π=h/2ħ), which we would prefer, you gain a 10/pi = 3.18 per mille quantum correction.

Nevertheless, if you consider the measurement error context of our analysis, the Tevatron W-boson mass data are in accordance with our measurements. If you consider our 3.33 (3.18) per mille value as an interval (we didn’t use that perspective before) this would be a very good fit to our Newton’s cradle data within our limits of precision of measurement: .95 per mille < 1.67 (1.59) per mille. If you look at Fig. 5 provided by Claudio Campagnari et al. presenting a W-boson mass range 80,270 to 80,470 you get a nearly 2 per mille span suggesting a crude validity of our considerations.

According to our data and theory on Newton’s cradle the Tevatron W-boson mass data, and all measurements before should be refocused, restructured, reanalyzed, reinterpreted, and rethought according to our 3.33 (10/pi) per mille Higgs-field-graviton-mass-interaction of measurement; questions of interest are many; es.g.: Did some measurements account for a W-boson, HIGGS-boson, quark, nucleon, electron etc. interaction, and some not? Did the different measurements of the W-boson mass account for a W-boson-Higgs-field-graviton-mass-interaction etc. in different ways? etc.). Our data, and theory demonstrate that gravitons (spin 2ħ quanta, respective particles) need to be added to the standard model of physics, and thus a graviton-Higgs-field interaction, or graviton quantum correction is needed in data on mass determination. This extension of the standard model can be achieved by an additional central orthogonal graviton dimension becoming an Higgs-boson-graviton axis in the middle of the circular standard model representation; supersymmetry can be added easily to this axis in a next orthogonal extension, and should be done: Emmy Noether's symmetries (see: Noether theorem, Lie groups: forming a curved space, cycle, or torus, you can add a gravitino opposite to the graviton, both outside the standard model disc) are in by a "point symmetry" due to the graviton, again.
Please, replicate, falsify, and improve our experiments, and theory [We don’t have the opportunity; however, by (international) funding we would be able to resume our very important experiments, and works: Address for donations below.].
Thus, the standard model holds the Tevatron data but improvement of the SM by integrating our data, and theory on Newton’s cradle, and the bifilar pendulum is appropriate. String theory, M-theory, Calabi-Yau theory, and supersymmetry should be rethought.

Yours respectfully
Stefan Geier
Gerhart-Hauptmann-Straße 6
D-83071 Haidholzen
Bavaria, Germany

 

Literature:

Claudio Campagnari, Martijn Mulders, An upset to the standard model, high-precision measurement of the w boson mass with the cdf ii detector, Science, 376, 6589, (136-136), (2022)./doi/10.1126/science.abm0101

Geier Stefan, Geier Caroline, Geier Stephanie, Geier Katharina, and Geier Constantin: Gravitons with Spin 2ħ in the Classical Pendulum: Quantum Physics Fits Newton's Classical Physics. Research Gate, August 2021, DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35308.69769

Geier Stefan, Geier Caroline, Geier Stephanie, Geier Katharina, and Geier Constantin: Newton's Cradle, the Damped Harmonic Oscillator, and Planck's Constant h: A Quantum Physics Solution for a Mechanical Ball Chain System. August 2021, ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353762880_Newton's_Cradle_the_Damped_Harmonic_Oscillator_and_Planck's_Constant_h_A_Quantum_Physics_Solution_for_a_Mechanical_Ball_Chain_System

Geier Stefan: Comment on: Geier Stefan, Geier Caroline, Geier Stephanie, Geier Katharina, and Geier Constantin: Gravitons with Spin 2ħ in the Classical Pendulum: Quantum Physics Fits Newton's Classical Physics. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353658741_Gravitons_with_Spin_2ħ_in_the_Classical_Pendulum_Quantum_Physics_Fits_Newton's_Classical_Physics/comments

Wikipedia